$2 Million Settlement Reached in Teen's Electrocution

In the spotlight

The Legal Intelligencer

September 24, 2008

By Amaris Elliott-Engel

A $2 million settlement has been reached in a wrongful death and survival action over the death of a 19-year-old who drank at the home of a friend before being electrocuted on the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Route 100 line.

The deceased's parents, Benjamin S. and Catherine L. Breskman, of Gladwyne, brought a wrongful death and survival action against SEPTA and against Donald F. and Sandra G. Daly, of Bryn Mawr, at whose home Brian E. Breskman visited a friend on the night he died.

The Dalys agreed to pay $2 million and SEPTA agreed to pay $50,000, according to a copy of the settlement general release in Breskman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority .

Brian Breskman was drinking cocktails at the home of a high school football buddy May 25, 2007, when he and his friends, Sam Daly and Ben Kissner, decided to go out to buy cigars and chewing tobacco, according to the plaintiffs' complaint.

Breskman's parents argued that the Dalys had a duty to disallow underage drinking at their home. "The Dalys knew, or should have known, that the boys were intoxicated, yet told the boys to walk to the 7-Eleven store that was approximately one mile away, furnishing flashlights for the boys' use and telling them to put on bright colored shirts," the complaint said.

It's not clear exactly how, but between his flight from the police and his body being struck by a SEPTA trolley, the man was electrocuted by the high-voltage electrical third rail of the Norristown High Speed Line, or the Route 100 Line, the complaint said. He was pronounced dead at 1:14 a.m. May 26 on a portion of track near the Rosemont station.

The Dalys said in their answer that Sam Daly, Breskman and Kissner consumed alcoholic beverages without their knowledge. The Dalys denied "that any alcohol was consumed on the evening in question with the Dalys' knowledge, consent or permission, or that it was furnished, supplied, served or provided by the Dalys," the answer said.

The Dalys admitted that Sandra Daly asked the boys to take flashlights and wear white T-shirts when walking to the store, but the Dalys denied knowing the boys had been drinking, the answer said.

Michael P. Dignazio, a solo practitioner in Media who was the Dalys' personal counsel, said if the case had gone to trial no liability would have been found against the Dalys.

Dignazio said that while the case was pending, Donald Daly died, and it was difficult for Sandra Daly to proceed in litigation while she was mourning. Settling the case was the best option for the family, he said.

"My client was seeking closure," Dignazio said. "When the insurance carrier was willing to settle within the policy limits, we thought it was the best thing to do to bring closure, not only to the Daly family but the Episcopal Academy community."

Allen R. Bunker of Comeau & Bunker was defense counsel of record and was assigned to represent the Dalys by their homeowners insurance company, Dignazio and Bunker said.

The plaintiffs argued that SEPTA was negligent because the third rails of the Route 100 line near the Rosemont Station weren't covered except at the top, the complaint said.

The third rails of the inbound and outbound tracks of the Rosemont station were readily accessible from pedestrian paths that crossed from one side of the tracks to the other, according to the complaint.

"The danger of pedestrians inadvertently coming into contact with high-voltage electricity used to power SEPTA conveyances is obviously and significantly less when the electricity is supplied through overhead wires, as on other SEPTA commuter rail lines, or through the third rails of its subway lines where the track area is submerged well below the level of the passenger platform area ... SEPTA knew this but acted in reckless, wanton and/or willful disregard of that knowledge," the plaintiffs' complaint said.

SEPTA said in its answer that Breskman was legally intoxicated at the time of the accident and denied negligence.

SEPTA defense counsel Mark E. Gottlieb of Anderson Kill & Olick didn't respond to a request for comment.

 

Ask Super Lawyers®:

Jim Beasley answers your questions: What can I expect in our first meeting? How long is the process?- Jim answers these questions and more in our video library.

See all videos >

Do I have a case?:

If you think you may have been wronged by someone or some entity please let us know what happened. We will help you determine the best way to proceed.

Ask us if we can help >

Courtroom Cowboy

The amazing journey of Jim Beasley, the founder of this firm, has been captured in an entertaining and uncensored biography.

Learn more >

PA Super Lawyers

View our ad in the digital version of Pennsylvania Super Lawyers 2011 magazine.

View ad >